On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote: > This will not work because em0 is having the clonable route for > 172.16.0/24 and so arp is unable to work on vether0 since you created an > addressing conflict.
Thank you for your response. I have been testing it further and I think I understand a little better. I have this working fine: Outside network routes 10.1.1.10 to 10.0.0.10. em0 (10.0.0.10/24) is bridged to vether0 (10.1.1.10/24) and I can access this scenario just fine. I am having a hard time getting a non-encrypted gif(4) tunnel working. Can anyone share a working config? I think if I can get gif(4) working right then I can get vether(4) working as well. Thanks again! Bryan
