On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Nick Holland <n...@holland-consulting.net> wrote: > On 06/23/10 06:36, Ektor Wetterstrvm wrote: >> I know http://bullshit.fefe.de/ is wrong / outdated / >> non-scientific / whatever... But what about this? Phoronix has more >> credibility imho... >> >> [benchmarks] > > facinating number of posts like this recently, all from gmail users > we've never seen before... > > What I want to see is a comparison of critical bug and security > problems, or percentage of subsystems that Just Work, or man page > accuracy. (or maybe packet filtering rates)
I agree, but you should admit that OpenBSD is clearly a looser in regard to "pure performances" (e.g. I/O, compression, encryption, etc.) > Nick. Bye, Ektor
