> ah, yes, I see what you mean, but this depends on the values chosen for
> A, B, somewhere, something.
Yeah sorry for the vagueness :)
Anyway I tested it just in case and as expected it didn't work.
> it might be simpler to combine the rules e.g.
>
> pass out on $ext_if proto tcp from {A, B} to port 25 nat-to $something
Indeed, I guess having the nat-to on the pass rule is the only way
(until the PR get solved ;)
I just wanted to avoid having more than one nat rule, and block rules
not gathered altogether at the top.
Thanks again for your help.
William
