Can we ask in the future something similar at src/*/shlib_version major bumps?



Index: current.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/current.html,v
retrieving revision 1.221
diff -u -r1.221 current.html
--- current.html 27 May 2010 14:11:42 -0000 1.221
+++ current.html 27 May 2010 17:48:08 -0000
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 <li><a href="#20100525">2010/05/25 - new config(8) for kernel builds</a>
 <li><a href="#20100526">2010/05/26 - gcc4 for amd64 and sparc64</a>
 <li><a href="#20100526a">2010/05/26 - f77 moved to ports</a>
+<li><a href="#20100526b">2010/05/26 - major bump</a>
 <!-- New additions go on the bottom, please -->
 </ul>

@@ -234,6 +235,12 @@
 /usr/share/man/cat1/f77.0 /usr/share/man/cat1/g77.0
 </b></pre></blockquote>

+<a name="20100526b"></a>
+<h3>2010/05/26 - Major bump</h3>
+Major bump at 2010.05.26 14:39 UTC.
+Pay attention: snapshots packages must be correspond with snapshots sets at 
major level.
+See: <a 
href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/shlib_version";>cvsweb</a>
+and <a href="http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=127488492723928&w=2";>commit log 
message</a>.

 <hr>
 <a href= "index.html"><img height= "24" width= "24" src= "../images/back.gif" 
border= "0" alt="[back]"></a>

Reply via email to