On May 09 08:11:40, Jan Stary wrote:
> On May 09 06:05:37, Robert wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 May 2010 19:08:09 +0200
> > Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > On May 08 17:53:25, Robert wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 8 May 2010 13:06:39 +0200
> > > > Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am running a recent 4.7-current on an Intel D510MO motherboard.
> > > > > http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/D510MO/D510MO-overview.htm
> > > >
> > > > > vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel Pineview Integrated Graphics
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Afaik,
> > > > that is a GMA500, PowerVR based and not supported by the intel
> > > > driver. So vesa is all you get with those, as there is no video-psb
> > > > driver in xenocara.
> > >
> > > It's a GMA3150.
> > >
> >
> > my bad, it's intel then.
> > the 3150 needs an even newer driver than the one oga posted.
> > 2.10 upwards, but somehwere along the way the xorg server might have to
> > be updated to 1.8 for that. not sure if the dri2/drm/gem/'whatever
> > it is all called' in the kernel is ready for 1.8 yet.
>
> I still think I have a problem before xorg even comes to play.
> Namely, 'intagp at vga1 not supported'.
>
> Looking at other machines' dmesgs (with both intel graphics or other)
> makes me think that 'intagp' is supposed to do what 'agp' does elsewhere.
> (There is a manpage for 'agp', but not for 'intagp'). Is this correct?
I mean,
\-vga1
|-intagp0
| \-agp0
|-inteldrm0
| \-drm0
\-wsdisplay0
> Am I right at thinking that until 'intagp' is supported on my machine,
> the intel driver of xorg doesn't have a chance? Or is the xorg intel
> driver independent of agp support?
What can I do do test / debug the intagp support (so that I have agp,
so that Xorg has /dev/agp0, so that it can use the intel driver)
on my hardware?
I don't mind using the vesa driver,
but I don't like none of the vesa modes
that seem to be supported on my hardware.
