On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:20 PM, bofh <goodb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Jean-Philippe Ouellet < > jean-phili...@ouellet.biz> wrote: > >> On 4/7/10 4:47 PM, bofh wrote: >> >>> Anyone know of a good standalone javascript deobfuscator? We want to run >>> it >>> against something like the results from tcpflow. >>> >> >> Standalone... not really, but I use a firefox plugin[1] and that has worked >> nicely for everything I've had to do so far. I looked for a good standalone >> deobfuscator a while back, but couldn't find one, and came to the conclusion >> that it was because you'd need a javascript engine anyway, and to make sure >> the code was properly reverse engineered to what is done in the browser, it >> would be best to actually use a browser and trace what is done. >> >> I know this isn't standalone, but I still hope it helps in your scenario. >> >> [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10345 >> > > Thanks. I know about that, but I need it to run in a from a script, and > have the output parseable by a script. >
doing some fun stuff with bro?
