On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:13:20PM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:34:48 +0100 > Claudio Jeker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm wondering if anyone is using the "rtable number" config option in > > OpenBGPD. Upcomming changes are currently conflicting with this > > feature and I wonder if we should remove it or fix it. > > > > I use this feature to provide fine-grained routing in some cases. > and I really looking for the same feature in ospfd. > so my opinion is to fix it >
So you run multiple bgpd on the same box? For ospfd there is something similar. It is possible to run multiple ospfd in different rdomains but that is not the same as the rtableid of bgpd. I can not see how you want to run multiple ospfd instances over the same interface (the protocol does not allow that). -- :wq Claudio
