Maybe because FreeBSD or NetBSD doesn't care so much about problems with laws against their users in feature?
Integrate good code from any source with acceptable copyright (ISC or Berkeley style preferred, GPL acceptable as a last recourse but not in the kernel, NDA never acceptable). We want to make available source code that anyone can use for ANY PURPOSE, with no restrictions. We strive to make our software robust and secure, and encourage companies to use whichever pieces they want to. There are commercial spin-offs of OpenBSD. http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html OT: Hammer FS looks like better candidate from this point of view On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Dan Naumov <dan.nau...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Kenneth R Westerback > <kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 01:33:07PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> Are there any plans to bring ZFS support to OpenBSD so that users >>> don't have to worry about things like fsck, running out of inodes and >>> other silly stuff in the year 2010? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> - Sincerely, >>> Dan Naumov >> >> Nope. Check the archives for repeated discussions. The license is still >> unsuitable last time I looked, if nothing else. >> >> .... Ken > > This is weird, it is claimed that CDDL is going against the BSD > philosophy, yet both FreeBSD and NetBSD didn't have any problems > including it in their base... > > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > > -- http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
