Hello,

Le Lundi 08 Mars 2010 05:13:34, vous avez icrit :
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Jean-Francois <jfsimon1...@gmail.com>
> wrote: ...
>
> > I am not sure but believe the problem is in smb.conf
>
> ...but you'll not actually show the contents of that file.  I take it
> you're taking the problem to the samba mailing lists then?

I used the default file, with "security user" and two mount points shared as
user. I then tried to change the paramters as "local master" and "domain
master" as explained in the mal and examples.
I did not ask to samba mailing list simply because I did not yet suggested it
came from smb.conf - I am not sure about this.

> > I tried to change many parameters to make nmbd LISTEN and answer UDP/137
> > requests without success.
>
> Repeat after me: UDP IS STATELESS.

Thanks for the reminder. Yet I did not know that for this reason, LISTEN
was'nt mentionned.

> Indeed, a quick examination of the output of netstat on any OpenBSD
> system shows that the state column is *always* empty for UDP sockets.
>
> As for answering requests, how do you know it isn't?  Did you trace
> the process?  Did you use tcpdump to confirm that the packets were
> being received?  Have you confirmed that your pf config isn't blocking
> them?

I did'nt trace the process, but tcpdump show the packets, pflog confirms that
the rule pass in pf.conf lets correctly passing the packets.

> It's been years since I've had to deal with samba, so I can't really
> help you further...other than to point out that you failed to provide
> any information about your system or the samba you're running.  What
> version of OpenBSD?  Did you install the samba package from the ftp
> site, or did you build the port yourself, or did you download the
> source and build it yourself without using the ports framework?

It's 4.6 default + samba 3 default from packages.
I did not copy all informations such as content of smb.conf and pf.conf as I
did not feel it necessary - for the first, it is close enough from default and
for the second it's perfectly patching what is needed for process to work.

>
> Philip Guenther

Reply via email to