On 2010-02-12, Graham Allan <al...@physics.umn.edu> wrote:
>
> I wonder if it's a viable option simply to run an active-active carp/pf
> pair, since the pfsync changes in 4.6?

Active/active works well, and allows traffic to pass in situations where
before it simply wasn't possible, but there are limits to what it can do.
In particular, throughput for high-speed TCP connections will be limited.

See the paragraph "There are some limits with how fast the traffic..."
in http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20090619100514 for more.

Reply via email to