On 2010-02-12, Graham Allan <al...@physics.umn.edu> wrote: > > I wonder if it's a viable option simply to run an active-active carp/pf > pair, since the pfsync changes in 4.6?
Active/active works well, and allows traffic to pass in situations where before it simply wasn't possible, but there are limits to what it can do. In particular, throughput for high-speed TCP connections will be limited. See the paragraph "There are some limits with how fast the traffic..." in http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20090619100514 for more.
