On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:23:27PM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not satisfied with the network performance on my OpenBSD
> firewall/router.
> CPU is Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz / with 4G ram
> OpenBSD server 4.6 GENERIC.MP#89 i386
> 

Update to current to get some msk fixes that should make msk(4)
faster. For high performance get a dual em(4) card since those will behave
much better (the interrupt mitigation on msk(4) is somewhat bad and causes
a 4 to 5 times higher delay).

> This pc/router/firewall is directly connected to a Gigabit HP
> 2810-48G switch.
> 
> Server:
> Ext interface:  Realtek 8169SC (re0 - IP 192.168.1.2/30
> Int interface: Marvell Yukon 88E8056 (msk0 - vlan61 - IP 10.100.61.2/30)
> The internal interface is a VLAN trunk (802.1Q) interface.
> 
> I have a client on VLAN 61 with IP 10.100.61.1/30 connected to the
> same switch.
> 
> I run iperf tests with iperf -s on server / iperc -c server on client.
> Changing window sizes didn't help.
> 
> I get 300 Mbps on the internal Interface and 350 Mbps on the
> external interface.
> Packet fowarding from an ftp server outside -> to the client inside
> is around 350-400Mbps
> wget -O /dev/null
> 
> I've tried changing net.inet.tcp.recvspace and net.inet.tcp.sendspace and
> the throughput settled in the values above with any value above 32768.
> 
> Now if I reboot the obsd machine in linux (same machine/same network
> configuration)
> I get 885 Mbps on the internal interface and 660 Mbps on the
> external interface)
> Packet fowarding from an ftp server outside -> to the client is
> around 600Mbps
> So apparently on the same machine I get double performance while
> running linux.
> 
> I've also tried changing net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen,
> net.inet.tcp.rfc1323, net.bpf.bufsize,
> net.bpf.maxbufsize, kern.maxclusters without any significant change
> in performance.
> 
> The machine itself downloads with max 350-400Mbps. Linux did at
> 600-800Mbps (wget -O /dev/null).
> pf is disabled and if enabled (+client nat) there is no significant
> loss from there.
> 
> Any ideas on how I could improve the performance? Any sysctl
> parameter I'm missing?
> Maybe it could be a driver problem (both of them?). Something wrong
> in the setup?
> 
> 
> best regards,
> 
> Giannis
> 

-- 
:wq Claudio

Reply via email to