On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Denis Doroshenko <denis.doroshe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/14/10, nixlists <nixmli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Does it have the same reliability features as qmail on an FS without >> softupdates? What about with softupdates? >> >> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html > > the very link you just provided contains the following sentence: > > Do not use async or softupdates filesystems.
Sorry, forget I mentioned softupdates. Does it do what qmail does? Reliaibility-wise? "qmail's queue, except for bounce message contents, is crashproof on the BSD FFS and most of its variants. "