I will implement a forum because it is mean to be included as small
lines in the end of some web pages for posting comments.

Otherwise, if someone knows a secure comments system available either
from package or from the web i'm interested.

After some searches for few days, i've come to the point where I prefer
not to implement anything rather than taking the ones I found either
forum or comments scripts.

Le dimanche 11 octobre 2009 C  22:13 -0400, Eric Furman a C)crit :
> The question was: "Does anyone know of a good secure Forum engine
> that runs well on OBSD."
> A debate of its merits vs a mailing list is a tad off topic
> and has nothing to do with OBSD.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:02 -0400, "Sean Howard" <sil...@callysto.com>
> wrote:
> > I think you're being pretentious a little bit.
> > 
> > A good usenet implementation is *closer* to a forum, which is what you
> > want. But forums are a different (more dynamic) use case. With smaller
> > entry barriers to large amounts of content.
> > 
> > --Sean
> > 
> > Somebody claiming to be Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> > > 2009/10/11 Mic J <michael.cogn...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Why is that better?
> > > 
> > > Because you get to pick your UI, because all your mail as amalgamated
> > > into one mailbox where you can sort it yourself where there's no easy
> > > place for garbage "off-topic" discussion, because your mailbox is
> > > where messages can be threaded properly, because there are no avatars
> > > or forum stats or ranks or administrators or moderators to create
> > > politics, because they're low overhead and easy accessible, because
> > > low-traffic mailing lists still catch everyone's attention where a
> > > low-traffic forum will eventually be ignored by the users... so on and
> > > so forth. There's bound to be a bunch of sites or archived
> > > rants/debates about this.
> > > 
> > > If it helps, compare your average forum goer with your average mailing
> > > list denizen. That alone should be enough...
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Samuel Baldwin - logik.li

Reply via email to