On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:30:25PM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > fluidsynth -ni Unison.sf2 beethoven_-_5th_simphony.mid fluidsynth: > > warning: Ignoring sample *KPianoB5: can't use ROM samples fluidsynth: > > error: Couldn't set libsndio audio parameters as desired Failed to > > create the audio driver > > your soundcard apparently can't do 48kHz 16-bit stereo.
Sure. Max 44100 Hz. > I'm going to take a wild guess and suggest you try using '-r 44100' > on the fluidsynth command line. Thank you for advice. Now I've got sound. However, I must say, timidity on FreeBSD 4.11 produce more fluently sound. Especially when speech together many instruments. > > >>> the way the manual says to. > > >> What make you think that I did not saw the manual? > > > > > > You should probably stop posting about now, you're starting to make > > > yourself look realy bad. > > > > Your are talking about unrelated topics, Paul. I do not care about how > > everything looks there and I did not ask your opinion about how I > > look... Good or bad - it is indifferent for me. By the way, absence of > > constructive reply starting to make you look really bad. > > btw, I tried finding 'beethoven_-_5th_simphony.mid' to see if I could > reproduce your problem or at least have some basic idea of what's > going on. I will e-mail you some files. > oh, wait. I found a dmesg: PR 6220. PII @ 349 MHz w/ s...@isapnp Correct. > ok, now I can believe you may have a "performance" issue. > > PS do you really think that's the kind of system most people would use > as a "desktop" in 2009? after all, this subthread started with you > saying OpenBSD might not be suitable as a desktop system, because of your > issue with timidity "performance". I affirm that it is timidity on FreeBSD 4.11 display more performance than timidity or fluidsynth both on OpenBSD 4.5. -- /Buzzer
