On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:04:18PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Milan BartoE!<merlyn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I still hear people (mostly younger people) complain about OpenBSD > performance > > > > I still hear people telling that OpenBSD is secure. It's of course > > true, but e.g. vnconfig uses quite weak crypto mechanism. I preffer to > > say OpenBSD is bugfree. Otherwise, it's still the best OS ever. > > what is weak about vnconfig crypto?
Before this thread gets outta hand . . . snicker . . . I just wanna say that oBSD is fun! It's not an OS that looks for trouble. Many OS;s sacrifice their open/free source principles in order to have many sheep at the trough (sp? . . trauff) In the spirit of the OP's question, tell your "inquisitive" freinds/clients that their questions do not make sense. If they want X, then this that and the other can make X a reality. Otherwise, they and those who feel it necessary to require "b'marks" need to . . . ummm . . settle down. . . In the end . . . especially with oBSD, we should not expect a markettiing scheme that tries to draw the typical humanities business owner (if there is such a thing). The product is 'as is'. . . no apologies. Theo, I apologise for taking you and your freinds for granted earlier (in the yesr). . . I appreciate you and your friends' time very much. BRAVO! -Neal P.s. -- If I may, can I decalre this thread over? P.s.s - of course not . . . let's hear it!
