On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Otto Moerbeek<o...@drijf.net> wrote: > > Not me. I would be very surprised if somebody I consider 'we' wrt > OpenBSD would have plans. But your definition of 'we' probably > differs. >
Thanks for the reply otto :-) Do you have plans to introduce binary updates for OpenBSD so that hours are not spent on compile time?. One of these days I found during following stable that there was CVS update for only one of the files. It is possible to just compile that file only with its dependencies so that if it is not a file in kernel I dont have to reboot but just restart the service/program in question? > Anyway, scanning though the paper this looks like taking loadable > modules to the extreme. We already do not have real suport for classic > loadable modules. > I noticed in one of Theo's mails that there wont be support for kernel modules in OpenBSD. Is it because there has to me massive changes in the source or is it because there is some problems with security? Thanks again for the fast reply :-) --Siju
