So is anyone else seeing an mbuf leak with rl(4) or is it specific to this machine/configuration?
On 2009-08-07, Lars Kotthoff <li...@larsko.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > after my post in June [1] I've removed the wireless card that seemed to be > causing the memory problems and my system is more stable now. However, after > about three weeks of uptime, memory starts running low again and the machine > starts swapping constantly. > > netstat -m gives me > 33805 mbufs in use: > 33790 mbufs allocated to data > 3 mbufs allocated to packet headers > 12 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses > 6/94/6144 mbuf 2048 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 0/8/6144 mbuf 4096 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 0/8/6144 mbuf 8192 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 0/8/6144 mbuf 9216 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 0/8/6144 mbuf 12288 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 0/8/6144 mbuf 16384 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 0/8/6144 mbuf 65536 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 156296 Kbytes allocated to network (99% in use) > 0 requests for memory denied > 0 requests for memory delayed > 0 calls to protocol drain routines > > 150 MB for network seems a bit much to me, especially since I can literally > watch that number grow. The system has 3 wired ethernet interfaces (2 of them > in > use), pflog0 and enc0. No other interfaces. Traffic levels are very moderate > -- > max 1 GB per day. > > Any ideas what's going on and what I could do about this? > > Thanks, > > Lars > > > [1] http://www.nabble.com/Memory-problems-on-4.5-td23901874.html
