> So now we can, perhaps, get back (if at all) to the man pages and what
> they are implying wrt original question.
> 
> Leon.

Let me post this as a inspiration to others newcomers:
Feel free to add a patch/diff if you really feel that the manpages are not 
clear enought,
let me help you on that way: 

* download the src.tar.gz/sys.tar.gz (or the pages of their online source)
* look around and feel the code
* ask yourself why. what's your goal? what is your problem? what do you want it 
to do?
* buy books. I love books, and everbody should have "The Design and 
  Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating System" - including your grandmother.
  some of it is old and outdated and that's why it's important.
* pick out the files you want to change
* learn the basic stuff about groff/troff if you only want to edit manpages.
* "it's always easy!", "it's fun!" and "why aren't I sleeping?"
* edit the file with your favorite editor
* diff -ruN 
* post it here and see the comments or be ignored.
* if it's necessary to change the code do all of it again.

I have readed the manpages several times and have never baffled at the wording. 


>> 'c' is a special partition that the kernel freely changes as the             
>>                      
>> mood hits it. A slight exaggeration.                                         
>>                      
>>    -- Kenneth R Westerback 26 July 2009 

OH MY GOD, NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY!!!

> > I am, at this stage of conversation (if one can call it such), noting
> > the difference (in my opinion) between implementation and definition

There is ALWAYS a difference while dealing with two "languages":
code <-> specification/documentation. 

I you don't understand that difference clearly, I recommend you'll try code in 
Java
following a specification who are too restricted to help you 
choose the BEST way to reach your goal. ;)

-- 
# Atle Kristensen
Sono stati 50 anni di intensa attivita e di successi... 
Non si e mai finito di imparare e creare per dar corpo ai sogni.
     -- Ernesto Colnago

Reply via email to