On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Insan Praja SW<insan.pr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:38:23 +0700, bsd...@gmail.com <bsd...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Presumably this would have been removed from the manual page if the >> issue were fixed. OpenBSD is usually good about keeping the >> documentation up to date and matching the code it comes with. On the >> other hand, it's difficult to test without knowing what the issue >> actually is... >> > > All my routers use em (4). I'm planning to move my cores physical access to > jumbo frames network. I hope it could fasten our network a little bit, so I > need to know if this udp traffic on jumbo frames will be a problem. If > anyone had any experience with udp traffic on an em (4) jumbo frame setting, > I'd love to hear them. > > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Insan Praja SW<insan.pr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Misc@, >>> From the em (4) man: >>> BUGS >>> There are known performance issues with this driver when running UDP >>> traffic with Jumbo frames. >>> >>> Is this info still valid? >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- >>> insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom >>> >>> > > Thanks, > > > Insan Praja > -- > insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom > >
No experience myself, but it's unusual for the man pages to be out of date. If it was fixed, the man page would have been updated. Test it yourself and see if the performance impact is going to be a problem in your network. -HKS
