> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > It is stuff that isn't on root's path. > > > > Ok-- it turns out I am even more naive than I previously thought. I can > see that /usr/libexec is not in root's path on my machine (maybe that's > why the 'usr' part is in there?). > > But why not?
Becuase it is stuff that isn't SUPPOSED TO BE on root's path. Does everyone on this list have ADD?
