On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 09:18, patrick keshishian<pkesh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Woodchuck<mar...@pennswoods.net> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:11 AM, patrick keshishian<pkesh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Woodchuck<mar...@pennswoods.net> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Mikolaj Kucharski<miko...@kucharski.name> > wrote: >>>>> Calendar told me that Unix billennium was today, but Wikipedia and >>>>> date(1) command say something different. >>>>> >>>>> Calendar wrote: >>>>>> Jul 09 B B B B Unix billennium begins at 01:46:40 UTC, 2001 >>>>> >>>>> $ date -r 1000000000 >>>>> Sun Sep B 9 02:46:40 IST 2001 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> References >>>>> B 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_billennium >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> best regards >>>>> q# >>>> >>>> [m...@marcus 0.5.0 1:1749]$ date -r 1000000000 >>>> Sat Sep B 8 21:46:40 EDT 2001 >>>> [m...@marcus 0.5.0 1:1750]$ date -ur 1000000000 >>>> Sun Sep B 9 01:46:40 UTC 2001 >>>> [m...@marcus 0.5.0 1:1751]$ >>>> >>>> Got to watch that time zone! >>> >>> "watch" the month. >> >> Ah, so. B Calendar is wrong, then. > > Possibly, or more likely the entry in ~/.calendar is incorrect.
Not really. It's just meant to mark the anniversary, not saying "today is the day" of the Unix billenium. Look through /usr/share/calendar/calendar.computer, lots of entries like that, just marking the anniversary of some historical significance, not the exact date. Regards Morten Liebach -- http://zentience.org/
