Hello The rules look identical to me at the moment, but i will doublecheck them, one thing thou i dont have same interface names at both boxes, thou the rules/queues are identical (they are built of out script for both boxes) only exception is that interface names are macros rather then static values and change by the box.
Aswell I'm using HFSC queue algorythm, could any that make any difference ? On E, 2009-06-01 at 22:47 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Georg Kahest <ge...@viatel.ee> [2009-06-01 15:21]: > > Yes the rulesets are identical, strange thing is from pftop it seems > > that it hits default queue (25mbit queue) but somehow the client gets > > 10~MB/s what seems more of interface root queue value rather then that > > default queue. Thou the real queue it should use is at 8mbit. > > that is expected with states without reference back to a rule. this > clearly proves your rulesets are not identical, because otherwise that > ref would have been there. > and in any case - current behaves differently, queueing info now lives > on the state. > > -- > Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org > BS Web Services, http://bsws.de > Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services > Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam > -- Georg Kahest <ge...@viatel.ee> ProGroup Holding
