Marco Peereboom <slash <at> peereboom.us> writes:
> This is currently correct because I am working on this particular case. > This one has proved to be very hairy hence it isn't in the tree yet. Good to know, thanks for the heads-up, I keep waiting then for 4.6, I guess? > > I'd expect the > > softraid, in order to be useful, to reboot on its sane leg. > > See previous comment. This is incomplete code. Thanks for the info. Complete is -current or will it be in 4.6? Uwe
