On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:40:39AM +0100, Peter Kay wrote: > Theo de Raadt wrote: > >Holy cow, 20+ messages about a damn bell, and important changes to > >the tree get ignored. > > > >Get a life, people -- get a frigging life! > > > Hi Theo.. I appreciate what you've done for the project, but *what* > changes to the tree? > > There's the message on openbsd-cvs about the MD changes to bsd and > bsd.rd, but many people aren't subscribed to that; > I myself am currently only subscribed to misc, plus the occasional > checking of openbsd.org. > > I'm sure this change is important, but a bell that (presumably) is > painful to hear *is* bloody annoying, so I don't see asking > how to fix it as being particularly unreasonable. Sometimes the minor > things are important, even if there are a few gaping holes > left lying around. Removing the wires from a laptop speaker is trickier > than a desktop. > > Cheers! > > PK. >
what you're saying is the bell is important. I sent a diff to try to allow bell controls to be created. that would allow it to be turned off and/or lowered/raised on most codecs. so right there is an important change to the tree. by your definition. -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
