On 20 April 2009 c. 14:14:18 Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com> [2009-04-20 12:02]:
> > On 20 April 2009 ?. 13:55:05 Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > and in any case this is less about ramdisk size but more about
> > > raidframe which we're going to get rid off eventually (when marco
> > > ever gets softraid upt o a usable level, read rebuild working)
> >
> > Hell, yes! But "eventually" is not "till the end of month", so I
> > have to use something that doesn't crash when doing newfs(8) during
> > installation now (I'll file a bug in a few days after collecting
> > more info on it). :(
>
> we certainly won't recommend to use raidframe by putting it into any
> of our standard kernels and then screwing people by removing it. if
> you use it now you know you're on unsupported territory and will have
> to deal with the fallout.
That's the strong point, no more stupid questions. :) Thank you.
--
Best wishes,
Vadim Zhukov
A: Because it messes up the way people read text.
Q: Why is a top-posting such a bad thing?
