It has already been explained in detail.
> OK then, can someone explain from the start to the end how this was set up ?
> Please include prices and discounts. I'm still confused about the
> method and reading again the thread is not helpful.
>
> Thanks
>
> On 4/18/09, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote:
> >> I was comming late to the show since I was enjoying my holliday.
> >> Please confirm or deny the theory I got from the long thread.
> >>
> >> I got the ideea that Wim received the CDs from source with 40% from
> >> the real price. Then, Wim must return the 60% "profit" back to the
> >> store.
> >
> > no, no no no no.
> >
> > He was supposed to keep 40% for each CD. Instead, he kept 40% + 45%.
> >
> >> How I see it is Wim has no profit from strictly CD selling only. To
> >> compensate this, Theo allowed Wim to use designs and art from OpenBSD
> >> in order to sell the tshirts and puppets. Wim could keep the entire
> >> profits from those, and can add soekris stuff.
> >
> > No. I gave him that on top of the 40% he was supposed to get as profit.
> > We expected him to pay the rest back.
> >
> >> The facts are simple, if I get it right: if the CD set is $100, Wim
> >> will pay $40 to it, sell it on $100 pay $40 to the store and return
> >> back $60 to the projects. One can verify quick and easy if Wim did
> >> what he agreed with Theo: multiply the number of shipped CDs with
> >> price and see if Wim returned the money.
> >>
> >> Is all this correct ?
> >
> > No. You have it wrong. Go back to reading school.
> >
> >> As Theo said many times, do not mix here donations and other stuff.
> >> When I saw the picture of Wim for the first time (
> >> http://www.kd85.com/images/Wim.jpg ) I said "Oh, what a sale agent
> >> picture. This is more like a business than an open source stuff !" But
> >> I am not entitled to judge by picture. I'm very sad for this news.
> >>
> >> Can someone post a picture with Wim's news house. Just to see if it's
> >> a good match for the watch.
> >>
> >> Thanks
