On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:10:29PM -0400, bofh wrote: > Should the "SEE ALSO" section include "pf.conf(5)"? >
yes, i think that's reasonbable. now fixed in -current. jmc
- small bug report for pf(4) bofh
- Re: small bug report for pf(4) Jason McIntyre
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:10:29PM -0400, bofh wrote: > Should the "SEE ALSO" section include "pf.conf(5)"? >
yes, i think that's reasonbable. now fixed in -current. jmc