because it is.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:36:47PM +0200, irix wrote:
> Hello Misc,
>
> In www.openbsd.org wrote "Only two remote holes in the default
> install, in more than 10 years!", this not true. I using OpenBSD
> like customer, not like administrator. And my OpenBSD were attacked,
> by simple MiTM attack in arp protocol. How then can we talk about the "
> security by default" ????
> For example, FreeBSD is decided very simply, with this patch
> http://freecap.ru/if_ether.c.patch
> When this is introduced in OpenBSD, so you can say with confidence
> that the system really "Secure by default" ?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
