On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:38:32PM +0000, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > The hammer FS seems promising from the BSDtalk Will & Matthew did.
HAMMER is a completely different beast. From my understanding, it attempts to avoid failures through clustering. But it doesn't have the resiliency to avoid data corruption, nor the recovery functionality, of ZFS. There was a thread recently on dragonfly-users that covered much of this. http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2009-01/msg00058.html -- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net/
