On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Pedro Martelletto <pe...@ambientworks.net> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:06:17AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: >> As a general matter, I'm a bit of a downer on ffs2 because I think >> it's the wrong solution. FFS was (and is) great for its problem >> domain, but outside the comfort zone it's not so hot. > > there's always the possibility of trying to make it comfortable, or
I think we've gone as far down that road as we're likely to enjoy going. > proposing a better solution. :-) Here, I have a couple ideas, just no time. Nor much motivation. ffs works for me. :)
