2008/12/12 ropers <rop...@gmail.com> > 2008/12/12 Stephan A. Rickauer <stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch>: > > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:11 +0100, ropers wrote: > >> What link are you sending the CARP advertisements over? E.g. do you > >> use a dedicated link (separate NICs and cable connection between the > >> CARPed machines) or do you send the CARP advertisements over existing > >> other links? (Which? Please illustrate.) > > > > I didn't know I had a choice what link to send the ads over. In other > > words, the CARP ads are send over the corresponding underlying, physical > > interfaces, without a dedicated link. > > > > e.g.: em0.a/em0.b=carp0 => ads send over em0's > > > > Can I use 'carppeer' to specify *one* dedicated link for all the other > > CARP interfaces? > > > > We do have a dedicated link for pfsync, though. > > Maybe --possibly-- my own understanding is sorely lacking. Let me try > to explain. The following requires a non-proportional font: > > Is this what your CARP setup looks like? > > external network > | | > OpenBSD#0 OpenBSD#1 > | | > internal network > > If so, are the CARP advertisements being sent via the external or > internal network? > > OTOH, if you have a dedicated link, maybe your setup looks like this? > > external network > | | > OpenBSD#0--------OpenBSD#1 > | | > internal network > > I was under the impression that it should be possible to exchange CARP > advertisements via the dedicated link (--------), though I have to > admit that I haven't actually built such a network yet -- I'm planning > to do that shortly. Maybe others can weigh in?
This wouldn't make sense with CARP. You'd only use a dedicated link for something such as pfsync. -- Liam J. Foy liamj...@netbsd.org
