On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:24:25PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> Hi Misc,
> Got this interfaces on my router,
> $ ifconfig em
> em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         lladdr 00:15:17:49:04:0d
>         description: ON_PORT_28
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
>         status: active
>         inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe49:40d%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
> em1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1600
>         lladdr 00:07:e9:0f:44:e3
>         description: ON_PORT_30
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex,rxpause)
>         status: active
>         inet 202.149.67.123 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 202.149.67.127
>         inet6 fe80::207:e9ff:fe0f:44e3%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
> em2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         lladdr 00:15:17:49:04:0e
>         description: BACK_IF.ISAT.BDG
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
>         status: active
>         inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe49:40e%em2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
>         inet 202.90.194.14 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 202.90.194.15   
> <---- look at this
>
>
> But BGPd said,
>
> $ bgpctl sh fib next
> flags: * = valid, B = BGP, C = Connected, S = Static
>        N = BGP Nexthop reachable via this route
>        r = reject route, b = blackhole route
>
> flags destination          gateway
> *BN   121.52.128.0/24      202.149.67.121
> *BN   121.52.128.112/30    202.90.194.3
> *BN   121.52.128.136/30    202.90.194.5
> *CN   202.90.194.0/29      link#8
> *BN   202.90.194.8/30      202.90.194.5
> *BN   202.90.194.16/30     202.90.194.3
> *BN   202.90.194.96/27     202.90.194.5
> *CN   202.149.67.120/29    link#3
> *SN   202.149.94.234/32    202.149.67.121
> *BN   202.149.95.0/24      202.149.67.121
> *BN   202.149.95.172/30    202.90.194.5
> *BN   202.149.95.220/30    202.90.194.5
>
> No flags *CN on network 202.90.194.12/30.
> Anyone can help?

Did you configure the interface after starting bgpd?
If this is the case I think I know where the problem is.

-- 
:wq Claudio

Reply via email to