On 2008-08-20, Graeme Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've had to connect to a new upstream peer which is advertising an IPv4 > safi of 128 (MPLS-labelled VPN address) > see http://www.iana.org/assignments/safi-namespace > > I've modified the source to temporarily ignore this (actually anything > over 127) as it currently only accepts 1 thru 3. Once the session is > established, everything works well. What I really need to know is if > this is potentially A Huge Mistake, or should bgpd be able to ignore > unsupported capabilities being advertised to it?
that's not a capability, it's an address-family type. my initial feeling is that the peer is probably not configured quite correctly...
