On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:10:09 +0200, Andreas Maus wrote: >Hi. > >I guess OpenBSDs named is affected by the actual issue: > >http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1447 >http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113 > >So I hope a patch is in progress ? >Or is OpenBSD not affected by this issue? > >So long, > >Andreas. >--
# tcpdump -nettti rl0 dst port 53 tcpdump: listening on rl0, link-type EN10MB Jul 09 19:48:27.786683 00:01:80:0f:2b:94 00:00:24:c6:18:85 0800 70: 192.168.80.4.16284 > 192.168.80.1.53: 57120+ A? pps.com.au. (28) Jul 09 19:48:43.690332 00:01:80:0f:2b:94 00:00:24:c6:18:85 0800 67: 192.168.80.4.1356 > 192.168.80.1.53: 32536+ A? ibm.com. (25) Jul 09 19:49:11.013223 00:01:80:0f:2b:94 00:00:24:c6:18:85 0800 69: 192.168.80.4.14540 > 192.168.80.1.53: 29420+ A? intel.com. (27) .... # uname -a OpenBSD master.witworx.com 4.3 GENERIC#698 i386 Guess again. Was that so hard to try? R/ ** note replies off-list are not required. If you insist you MUST use the reply-to: address. The sender address is a tarpit except for the list servers. *** Rod/ A consultant is someone who's called in when someone has painted himself into a corner. He's expected to levitate his client out of that corner. -The Sayings of Chairman Morrow. 1984.
