I wanted to make a correction here as I got a comment that puzzled me
and that may have created a miss understanding on my part on the way I
wrote my text.
If the perception have been taken by anyone as a complain, or otherwise
I want to apologies for this!
It's possible that some may have taken it to mean bad things and if so I
am very sorry for it and that sure wasn't the intend here.
If Marco took it as a complain as well I want to make sure I correct
this and retract that as well as offering my public apology for that!
And just that I don't create an additional miss understanding, no Marco
didn't comment to me in case anyone thought he did on this post.
Sure this wasn't my intention what so ever and far from it. There have
been lots of chances and improvements and I thought testing the
snapshots and reporting bugs was the intent if any?
The crash on the Sun X4100 M2 is an old issue and it may have been fix
or may so, I tested it as well as to see if the new memory works too. I
only wanted to report my tests that all is still working as it was for
three of the kernel and that on the amd64 bsd.mp, the same issue was
still present.
There was lots of thought at the time that ACPI may have major impact on
this crash and looking at the source changes in the last few weeks there
have been lots of changes there too.
So, I thought it was important to test it and report it.
Obviously I don't write well and some may have taken it as bad from my
part witch really wasn't near my intention or thoughts when I wrote my
previous report.
Again if anyone read something in it, that wasn't intentional for sure,
then again I sure apologies for it!
More importantly as well if Marco took offense to it, I sure deeply
regret that as well and accept my apology for that. It wasn't even near
the intent of it.
I hope this clear any possible miss understanding from my post that sure
wasn't there intentionally from me.
Daniel
