Hi Stuart.
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-03-05, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If you are able to, please submit a dmesglog of the running machine to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- with the Subject: set to the type of your machine
(ie. SunFire V215, or IBM eServer 325 or such) -- and PLEASE avoid the
use of MIME, but instead send your messages without any special
encoding since it lets our developers grep easily through the logs
looking for specific machines when they are fixing bugs. Recently, I
have had to start deleting the MIME submissions with the SPAM.
Is this working for mail systems that are behind NAT/hidden otherwise?
Or would I have to "proxy" my dmesgs through a "real" server rather than
using the default sendmail setup on the test machines?
It's always a good idea to make sure they're sent from an address which
works, so people can get back to you if they have questions.
One can always change the From and/or Reply-To headers to show the
receiver where to point replies.
Isn't it also against the RFC just to silently drop messages and give
sender the accepted for delivery code?
I usually
mail them to myself and then forward them (plaintext, inline, cutting out
the "Forwarded from ..." junk) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This has another advantage
that
they're then in a local Sent folder if I need to find them again later.
Yes that's probably easier than scp + ssh + MUA.
--
Antti Harri
