I find it somewhat astonishing, bordering on the incredible, that someone who claims to be knowledgeable about such things as spamd and a few related pieces of software would first post to this list with a reply-to address that the recipient mail server bounces as undeliverable, then later progress to posting here with the reply-to address set to something the receiving system considers a 'spamtrap'.
But indeed it has happened. You know who you are, please stop it. If this nonsense continues, I will post *all* the data. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
