On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:50:21AM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:

> In essence, this is suggesting to move third party software
> installed by the project's third party software management
> tools out of /usr/local, so that it is out of the way for
               ^^^^^^^^^
> users who want to install software on their system without
> using the project's third party software management tools.

Yes, indeed; why not, if you know, that such approach can be a problem for
the user?

> I can imagine one response:  Port whatever it is, or else

That cannot be a valid response, when given to the _user_.

> change where it will be installed if you don't want to port
> it.

Yes, that's exactly the problem: it'll be installed (that "non-ported"
software) where all "ported" software is installed already - into
/usr/local. It's default for all source packages since years. So, why not
to install all the ported software into something like /usr/pkg, or
/usr/ported, for example?

It does work in NetBSD - it could work exactly as good in OpenBSD.
-- 
                                pozdrawiam / regards

                                                Zbigniew Baniewski

Reply via email to