On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:01:52 -0500, "Kevin Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Eric Furman wrote: > > > *BULLSHIT*. > > You have so completely missed the point it is to laugh. > > Apples and Oranges. > > Remember OBSD isn't GPL'ed > > There's no need to continue this on the list because you don't get the > analogy so I'm replying directly.
Then why did you cc the list? > > I didn't say that OBSD is GPL'ed, did I? I said that selling software No, but you are making comparisons. OBSD doesn't follow GPL's rules. > that's available at no cost (GPL software someone has bought and > re-released to the public) is no different than selling software that's > available at no cost (an OpenBSD CD versus the .iso format available to > the public). > > In both cases you are taking software that is freely (cost) available > and selling it via some physical medium. Yes, but the *intentions* are completely different. > > I even stated that it was just something that I had picked up as an > implication and that for those of us that interpreted your statement in > that fashion, the analogy made sense. How is that bs? > > I've no qualms being someone's laughing stock because they fail to > understand something so feel free to laugh away. My regret is that I > failed to sufficiently explain the analogy, and why at least a few of us > felt it was appropriate, in a manner you could understand the first time. *I* understand perfectly, but because you have swallowed a lot of GNU baloney you don't get my original point and I don't feel like wasting my time explaining it to you. > If you still do not understand the analogy, and why I agree with Daniel > that it was an appropriate one, please feel free to email me directly > and we can discuss it. There's no point in continuing to butt heads on > the list. I know why you agree with him. No further discussion is necessary.
