On 01/07/08 12:31, Richard Stallman wrote: > Those quotes do not show gNewSense includes non-free software. > > What's interesting is that they admit they cannot find all blobs without > truly > reading and understanding the code, they lack people for it. > > They say they can't reliably find all the binary-only firmware. > Nobody's perfect. > > What matters is that they are doing their best, and that they fix > problems that are reported to them.
Let's see what happens: I report the whole gNewSense project is not according to it's goals. > That's all I can ask of anyone. Richard, you publicly state that gNewSence is up to your standards. If to your standards it's OK if a few people who admit they are incompetent say "we have done our best to get it clean", while others say "we know that with Ubuntu, our source, new sub standard code is inserted on a regular basis" I get again the idea "Richard Stallman is morally defect". Richard Stallman: You know gNewSense is by far not conform what you tell people about it. You bring it as an alternative and it is not. +++chefren
