Richard Stallman wrote: > That is not what happened. I stated an accurate conclusion based on > recent research. I expressed it with words that were not clear. > > I've explained the details several times, so I won't repeat now. > Funny thing about details When they are accurate they can be repeated and repeated, easily and generally without inducing errors. When the details and conclusions were always fuzzy, they keep coming up differently that is if you remeber enough to know what you did say.
As long as this thread has been running, the only plausible reasons I can think of for you not to repeat your claimed accurate conclusion is either that you do not remember what this claimed accurate conclusion was or that this claimed accurate conclusion wold now be yet another falsehood. There might be a point to freedom in software, but from everything I've seen, you have only succeeded int making your position look silly and preposterous. Your idea of "freedom" seems to be that everyone subscribe blindly to your (and exclusively your) (I have no idea what) For any rational sense of freedom, OpenBSD seems to me to fit. You do not. Essentially, your tyranny is not my freedom.
