On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:30:09AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > I guess I missed the part where you explained how it makes sense to > apply a label like "not recommended because it supports non-free > software" to OpenBSD but not to FSF (emacs, etc.). > > As I've said, I think it's acceptable for free applications to run on > non-free platforms (and say that they do), because this doesn't > recommend the installation of those non-free platforms. But free > systems should not recommend, suggest, or offer to install non-free > apps.
I hope you do realize how much this reminds us of _1984_ ? Not talking about something is a bit like sticking your head in the sand. It's really not a healthy attitude. As far as free software goes, it's a bit like developping everything in your own corner, completely ignoring whatever goes on in the commercial corner of the world... or not acknowledging its influences. I'm sorry, but not talking about something that exists won't make it go away.
