> Richard, you are too stupid to go and learn FACTS before you open > your big fat lying mouth. > > I am sure the readers can judge for themselves whether I am stupid. > They will certainly see I am not perfect. I had learned the facts > about OpenSolaris, but that was months before. By the time I did > that interview my memory was incorrect.
Twice you called free things non-free, and once you called a non-free things free. Your memory was incorrect? I bet you make such a mistake again in a few weeks. If you can't be accurate, perhaps you should not do interviews. > In addition, I thought that OpenSolaris was just a kernel, but it > looks like the question had in mind a whole system. This > miscommunication has the effect of making my statement appear to be an > endorsement of a system. Huh? OpenSolaris is just a kernel, and this helps you how? The kernel is not free -- it never was. It has a couple of handful of required drivers which are not included. It is not free, in any sense. Yet you failed to do any research about this before you went into the press. > Partly I had forgotten and partly I fell into a miscommunication. > I am sure the readers can judge for themselves how grave that is. Someone like you is not allowed to spread mistruths like this in the media. > "Lying" is another matter. That is a grave accusation which you and > others have made with absolutely no basis. Shouldn't you make sure of > the facts before you accuse? Since you did it three times so rapidly, I am calling you a liar. And since you refuse to undo your commercial support in Emacs and GCC, I am going to call you a hypocrite.
