On Jan 1, 2008, at 6:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr Stallman i now see the dogged determination that has made you
effective,
He's not a doctor. In any sense of the word. Honorary degrees don't
give you the right to use the title or to be called by it.
--- Marina Brown
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.surferz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA7B149CB6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:33:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.surferz.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.surferz.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port
10024) with LMTP id 01692-04-28
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:32:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shear.ucar.edu (lists.openbsd.org [192.43.244.163])
by mail.surferz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF7F149736
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:32:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from openbsd.org (localhost.ucar.edu [127.0.0.1])
by shear.ucar.edu (8.14.1/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m01LS4Pw025278;
Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:28:04 -0700 (MST)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10])
by shear.ucar.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m01LOYXn016757
for <misc@openbsd.org>; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:24:34 -0700 (MST)
Received: from rms
by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1J9ob9-0005Sz-GD; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:24:31 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Paul Greidanus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (message from Paul
Greidanus on Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:48:47 -0700)
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Open-Hardware]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:24:31 -0500
X-Loop: misc@openbsd.org
Precedence: list
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at surferz.net
I'm curious how you can recomend an OS, like gNewSense that
only runs on
non-free hardware, that
has required non-free software to be used in it's creation?
How do you do these things? Perhaps I do them the same way.
The term "non-free hardware" is misleading, because the issues that
divide free software from non-free software do not apply to hardware.
There are no copiers for hardware and it has no source code.
As for Intels use of non-ree software, I am sorry for them, and I hope
that someday they will be able to move to free software.
