bofh wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 7:15 PM, Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Claus Assmann wrote: > > > > > > Wrong. > > > > > > If someone cracks a website, then he can put up a modified binary > > > and a modified MD5 checksum. > > > > This is silly. You mean that you get the checksums and the > > associated binaries from the *SAME* website? > > You're probably being sarcastic, but in the case of the master site, > it doesn't matter, because all the slaves probably rsync from the > master anyway.
You know something is wrong when the checksum changes when the files have not changed ;-) > > > -- > http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk > "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." > -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. > "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or > internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks > factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford
