2007/10/26, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 10/25/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You're also a sysadm who refuses to read a paper written by a google > > researcher, who's team found massive bugs in every VM. > > That's not quite correct. Restating (yet) again: > > 1. Ormandy [1] states that Xen's design is congruent with good security [...]
And your point is ? Xen is good enough. (?) Well, you may want to read this white paper more carefully. > [1] http://taviso.decsystem.org/virtsec.pdf "The results obtained demonstrate the need for further research into virtualisation security and prove that virtualisation is no security panacea." Piotr Kapczuk
