Looks like PC-XXXX and PC2-XXXX will be a better form to display to prevent a confusion.
- Alexey. On 10/9/07, Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:26:28AM +0300, Alexey Suslikov wrote: > > Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x52 DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC25100CL5 > > > > CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does "PC25100" mean here? :) > > > > Thanks. > > It seems the code was incorrectly using "PC2" as a prefix > in the DDR2 case, I'll fix that later today.
