Without a mutually-trusted source of time "cookies", it depends on
specific needs.

Further infomation on the nature of the transaction is required since I
haven't heard of a pre-packaged oss application.

Doug.



On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:36:37PM +0200, G?bri M?t? wrote:
> Sorry i wasn't totally specific. Yes, later on the reciever need to
> verify the timestamp. I was looking for an oss application but couldn't
> find any for timestamping.
> 
 
> Douglas A. Tutty ?rta:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:21:53PM +0200, G??bri M??t?? wrote:
> >> I've read a lot about timestamping a document, but dunno how it works in
> >> practice. How can i apply a timestamp to a digitally signed or encrypted
> >> document? Like i encrypt or sign a document with gnupg, but before the
> >> process how can i timestamp it?
> >> Sorry for the stupid question but i really can't imagine it.
> >>
> > 
> > I suppose the first question is: is the time stamp for info only or does
> > the recipient have to verify the accuracy of the timestamp?  I.e. lets
> > say you take the file you want to encrypt and sign, put it in a tarball
> > that will protect the file's modification time, and encrypt and sign
> > that.  This gives the recipient your opinion on the timestamp and
> > protects it from being changed enroute.  However, the recipient can't
> > verify that you or your system are telling the truth.
> > 
> > I don't know if there's an accepted strategy, but if I had to create one
> > from scratch, off the top of my head I'm thinking some time of time
> > server.  It would have to publish a signed file of the current time, say
> > once per minute, so that you could include the hash in the above noted
> > tarball.  The recipient could note the time of that hash file, query the
> > time server for the matching hash and compare the two.  If they match,
> > then the time matches.
> > 
> > This would have to be a time server that is trusted by the recipient.  
> > 
> > I'll be interested to hear from someone who really knows about this.
> > 
> > Doug.
> > 
> > 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFHA+E08najRxwF9nkRAkZnAJ9F83yBOJ7KhTgUngOtFAcCWJeDcwCeOEUS
> MxT2+9gw9WpbIi6BXfeeSSc=
> =0rKL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to