So you are suggesting that all the ethics ramblings coming out of gnu.org aren't relevant? Because gnu.org is clearly looking the other way ignoring copyright infringement.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 07:41:55PM -0400, bofh wrote: > On 9/15/07, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This has everything to do with Stallman's FSF/SFLC lawyer cronies. > > They're the ones giving faulty counsel to Linux developers. > > I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on this. People who > have spoken with him indicated to me that he is forthright about what > he wants (ie, GPL), and does not back down easily, unless you give him > a very good reason (ie, you better be damned convincing and have facts > on your side). Much like Theo, actually. > > As this is a matter of interpretation of law, I doubt if he would be involved. > > I may be wrong. > > -- > "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." > -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
