yeah well, the problem is really with one of the windows servers in a NLB
multicast cluster. Two identically configured (to my knowledge) VPN servers
have two different IP address pools for incoming connections and the problem
is that one server once the connection is established responds to  ARP
requests for the client IP with correct true interface MAC and the other
server responds with virtual cluster MAC. ARP proxy seems to be a working
remedy for this issue but in reality it's not a solution. If I could find out
why BSD overwrites static arp entries I can let this issue with VPN cook a
little longer.

regards, S.

----- Original Message ----
From: Bryan Irvine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stanislav Ovcharenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2007 1:09:16 AM
Subject: Re: apr
proxy problem

On 9/5/07, Stanislav Ovcharenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
need to have ARP proxy running on my router/firewall loaded with OpenBSD
>
4.0.
> I'm seeing some behavior that is contradictory to what arp man page
>
says.
>
> arp -an | grep em1 says
> (111.111.111.111) at 00:cc:00:cc:00:cc
>
on em1
> permanent static published
>
> and than ...
>
> cat
>
/var/log/messages | grep em1
> tells me that
> Sep 5 14:11:11 XXXYYY /bsd: arp
> info overwritten for
> 111.111.111.111 by 00:aa:00:aa:00:aa on em1
>
> which
is
> contrary to what arp
> man page says about permanent attribute and what
one would
> expect.
>
> any info
> why this is happening would be greatly
appreciated,
> thanks for looking.


I had nothing but problems when trying to
use arp proxy.  I'd ditch it
and try something else (if possible).  What's the
eventual goal?

--Bryan
_____________________________________________________________________________
_______
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to